For Christmas I received a fascinating present from a pal - my very own "very popular" book.

"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (terrific title) bears my name and my picture on its cover, championsleage.review and it has glowing evaluations.

Yet it was completely written by AI, with a few basic prompts about me supplied by my good friend Janet.

It's an interesting read, and very amusing in parts. But it also meanders rather a lot, and is someplace in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.

It imitates my chatty style of composing, however it's likewise a bit recurring, and really verbose. It might have exceeded Janet's triggers in collecting information about me.

Several sentences begin "as a leading technology journalist ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.

There's also a mystical, repetitive hallucination in the form of my cat (I have no family pets). And there's a metaphor on almost every page - some more random than others.

There are lots of companies online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.

When I called the president Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had actually sold around 150,000 personalised books, generally in the US, since rotating from putting together AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.

A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller costs ₤ 26. The company uses its own AI tools to generate them, based upon an open source big language design.

I'm not asking you to buy my book. Actually you can't - just Janet, who developed it, can purchase any further copies.

There is currently no barrier to anyone developing one in any person's name, consisting of stars - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around violent content. Each book contains a printed disclaimer stating that it is fictional, developed by AI, and developed "solely to bring humour and delight".

Legally, the copyright belongs to the company, but Mr Mashiach stresses that the product is meant as a "personalised gag present", and the books do not get offered further.

He wants to broaden his variety, producing different genres such as sci-fi, and possibly using an autobiography service. It's created to be a light-hearted type of customer AI - selling AI-generated goods to human clients.

It's also a bit terrifying if, like me, you compose for a living. Not least due to the fact that it probably took less than a minute to generate, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound much like me.

Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have revealed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then produce comparable content based upon it.

"We ought to be clear, when we are talking about data here, we in fact imply human creators' life works," says Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, prazskypantheon.cz which projects for AI firms to respect creators' rights.

"This is books, this is posts, this is images. It's artworks. It's records ... The entire point of AI training is to find out how to do something and then do more like that."

In 2023 a song featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social media before being pulled from streaming platforms since it was not their work and they had actually not consented to it. It didn't stop the track's developer trying to nominate it for a Grammy award. And despite the fact that the artists were fake, wolvesbaneuo.com it was still wildly popular.

"I do not think making use of generative AI for creative purposes need to be banned, but I do believe that generative AI for these purposes that is trained on individuals's work without permission should be banned," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be really effective however let's construct it morally and relatively."

OpenAI says Chinese rivals using its work for their AI apps

DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking

China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and damages America's swagger

In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have actually selected to block AI developers from trawling their online material for training purposes. Others have actually chosen to collaborate - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for instance.

The UK federal government is considering an overhaul of the law that would allow AI developers to use developers' material on the web to assist establish their designs, unless the rights holders opt out.

Ed Newton Rex explains this as "insanity".

He mentions that AI can make advances in areas like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.

"All of these things work without going and changing copyright law and ruining the incomes of the nation's creatives," he argues.

Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in your house of Lords, is also highly versus getting rid of copyright law for AI.

"Creative markets are wealth developers, 2.4 million jobs and a whole lot of joy," says the Baroness, who is likewise a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.

"The government is undermining one of its finest performing industries on the unclear pledge of development."

A federal government spokesperson said: "No relocation will be made till we are definitely positive we have a useful plan that provides each of our goals: increased control for right holders to assist them accredit their content, access to top quality material to train leading AI models in the UK, and more transparency for ideal holders from AI designers."

Under the UK federal government's new AI plan, a national information library consisting of public data from a vast array of will likewise be offered to AI scientists.

In the US the future of federal guidelines to control AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.

In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that intended to improve the security of AI with, among other things, firms in the sector required to share information of the workings of their systems with the US federal government before they are launched.

But this has now been reversed by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do rather, however he is said to desire the AI sector to deal with less regulation.

This comes as a number of suits versus AI companies, and especially against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have been gotten by everybody from the New York Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.

They declare that the AI firms broke the law when they took their content from the internet without their authorization, and utilized it to train their systems.

The AI business argue that their actions fall under "fair usage" and are for that reason exempt. There are a variety of elements which can make up fair use - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector suvenir51.ru is under increasing examination over how it gathers training information and whether it should be paying for it.

If this wasn't all adequate to contemplate, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the past week. It became the a lot of downloaded complimentary app on Apple's US App Store.

DeepSeek claims that it established its technology for a portion of the cost of the likes of OpenAI. Its success has actually raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's existing supremacy of the sector.

When it comes to me and a career as an author, I think that at the moment, if I actually desire a "bestseller" I'll still have to compose it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the present weak point in generative AI tools for larger jobs. It has plenty of mistakes and hallucinations, and it can be rather challenging to check out in parts due to the fact that it's so verbose.

But offered how rapidly the tech is evolving, I'm uncertain the length of time I can stay positive that my considerably slower human writing and editing abilities, are better.

Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the greatest advancements in worldwide technology, with analysis from BBC reporters worldwide.

Outside the UK? Register here.